Page 6 of 6

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:50 am
by Sebastian@d16
Hi,

There're some ideas / features reserved for LuSH-101 next gen. Among the others it's gonna be FM modulation with real operators - Yes, LFO when tracking enabled can operate in audible range, however they aren't real FM operators in strict sense of the word. As for the offset, also in next LuSH there'll be transposition set independently for each waveform. But right now I'm not certain which of those features could be implemented in the update, and which one would be left for the upgrade. We're pretty much focused on SilerLine upgrades and next in line there's Classic Boxes Collection. So pretty much work to do before thinking of improving our flagship synth :) --- believe me; we can't wait for the moment.

Cheers,
Sebastian

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 3:10 pm
by the fiddler
Thanks Sedastian, Keep up The good Work. :D

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:00 pm
by Norrin
Am I crazy, or is there no feature to have the LFOs run in 1/8 tri? I just noticed this when I went to set my vibrato to 1/8 tri and dot. Am I missing something, or is this an actual feature request?

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:23 am
by Sebastian@d16
Hi,

We were suggested this by customers directly (via Helpdesk) so it's on our ToDo list. No sure whether it's going to be added in v1.x.x though. Still don't have precisely outlined development road map since we're been finalizing few other projects right now. Stay tuned :)

Kind regards,
Sebastian

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 4:40 am
by Norrin
Thanks for the reply! Glad to know this synth is still on D16's radar, even if it is several years old. It's still in my top five VSTs of all time, so I anxiously await this addition, whenever it comes. :)

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:26 pm
by FredrikTiC
Is NKS kompability planned ? This is a feature i would love to have.

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:46 pm
by Sebastian@d16
Hi,

Yes. We do plan to include NKS compatibility.

Cheers,
Sebastian

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:12 am
by andrei.tuduran
Hi Sebastian,

Really in love with LuSH-101! Anyway, are there any plan for it? My suggestions will be :
1. A standalone app for LuSH-101 would be so nice.
2. Any skin colours for it ?

Best regards!

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:52 am
by Sebastian@d16
Hi,

Thank you for kind words about LuSH-101 and your suggestions. The standalone versions definitely is a good idea, not only for LuSH but for all our instruments.

Kind regards,
Sebastian

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 7:57 am
by andrei.tuduran
Yes, that would be so great especially for making presets or live performance. We won't be forced to open the DAW to do that. :D
LuSH-101 already is kinda a standalone app inside DAW with layers, mixer, effects and everything.

Some nice skins with various colours would be nice too but I can live with that. :wink:

Keep up the good work and don't let LuSH-101 to be buried in the shadows of other VST synths. It deserves to be in Top 5. :mrgreen:

Invest in more marketing because this synth needs to be heard more!

Best regards!

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:16 pm
by dahkter
Hello,
suggestions:
1. pitch frequency snap to semitones
2. allow fine tune to work with pitch frequency
3. arp master rate slider to manually set the base speed of arp prior to current rate division knob
4. expanded midi control - allow one midi cc to control multiple controls on multiple layers (for example, midi ch1, midi cc#7 - can control saw volume on all eight layers at the same time)
Thanks

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:15 am
by Berrabub
As mentioned before, Lush needs skins. The white can be a bit tense on the eyes after a few hours.

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:54 am
by waltercruz
  • * microlush (single layer)
    * info of the faders values with hovering, without need to click on it (and changing the value)

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:34 pm
by andrei.tuduran
As a feature request for the new version if it will be one, is to add more oscillator types. :)