Page 2 of 6

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:00 am
by Sebastian@d16
Hi guys,

Thank you for all the suggestions and ideas how to develop further our latest baby! I just wanted to comment on the suggestion about adding LFO and Envelopes as additional sources for modulation matrix. I'm afraid this won't happen, because it'd increased CPU usage so significantly that the plug-in itself wouldn't be usable, unless you had limited using it to single layer. We'll yet reconsider this, but i'm 90% certain this feature won't appear within one of upcoming 1.x updates.

Best regards,
Sebastian

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:56 am
by computer controlled
Really, it's fine just how it is =o]

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 7:46 pm
by blacker
Maybe I'm missing something, but is it possible to quickly copy one layer to another? For example, I might get something going on one layer, and just want to thicken that sound up by doubling it up and tweaking it. I realise you could save as a timbre, then load in the next layer, but it would be cool to right-click on layer one button, choose copy then paste in the same way to the new layer.

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:24 am
by Sebastian@d16
Hi,

It's possible to copy settings from one Layer onto the other, Prev and Next buttons in Timbre browsing section have a little labels below them "Copy" and "Paste". It means you can alter their functionality with CTRL key pressed on a keyboard (or if you use Mac OS with CMD button). Basically those two buttons can be used to store the current Layer in the copy buffer and to paste the buffer over the currently selected Layer.

Best regards,
Sebastian

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:30 pm
by blacker
Aha! I should have noticed that - excellent, thanks.

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:33 pm
by twisted-space
Any chance of a single layer version with no fx?

More of a Micro-LuSH perhaps.

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:00 am
by Sebastian@d16
Hi,

We're considering making such a version of LuSH-101 :)

Best regards
Sebastian

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:09 pm
by alpha604
We're considering making such a version of LuSH-101 :)

Best regards
Sebastian
This would be fantastic. I prefer using my external effects and multiple tracks in my DAW instead of the Layers in LuSH. Just release something more synthy and less ReBirthy.

The GUI and sound are what sold me on LuSH (edit: as a new 101 emulator to replace TAL Bassline). The layers and effects are cool, but usually just get in the way and make me feel like I payed for way more than what I am using... it's like driving a truck to a coffeehouse in Barcelona or L.A. because you can't find a decent bicycle... or something.

It would be fun to see LuSH released as a standalone product (edit: in addition to a 1-layer version) with a pattern sequencer on each layer with program banks. Maybe the synth engines could be like modules, so you could drop in a LuSH or Phoscyon module on a layer, then add a sampler, drum machine, etc... FXpansion has something similar with "Fusor", but based on the layout of LuSH, I bet D16 could make something more intuitive. That would be amazing for brainstorming and plane rides, and even live performance.

move or change color of "overwrite"?

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:16 pm
by alpha604
Can the "Overwrite" button in the Save Changes dialog box be moved or colored red? I keep almost clicking that instead of the discard button because they look so similar.

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:38 am
by Sebastian@d16
Hi,

Sounds good :) I've just added it to our ToDo list. We'll differentiate color themes for confirming buttons (like "Confirm", "Ok", "Save", "Overwrite") and canceling buttons (like "Cancel", "Discard", "Close").

Best regards,
Sebastian

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 6:48 pm
by vol
please connecting :D

ENV,LFO → Supersaw - DETUNE,AMT

Sorry, I don't understand English. :oops:

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:10 pm
by Sebastian@d16
Hi,

At the moment i'm afraid we won't do that, because that'd increase CPU usage greatly (processing Mod Matrix would have to be performed every sample, so much often than now it is).

But when we figure out how to provide multi core support for LuSH-101 to be working on Mac and PC as well, we'll reconsider your idea.

Best regards,
Sebastian

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:52 am
by onesnzeros
I'd like a single layer version, and the ability to switch off the modified patch warning.
The multi-timbre architecture, together with the lack of multicore support is a killer, i just can't believe there is no mono-timbral version. :shock:

I have 2 very powerful computers (Win & OSX) and what I would consider the best ASIO drivers available (RME) but i still can't get the most out of this synth.

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:23 pm
by Sebastian@d16
Hi,

@onesnzeroes: We'll consider you idea of making "crippled" version of LuSH-101 with single layer without the mixer. But keep in mind that we're currently doing a research for best possible method of providing multicore support to our software and by that making LuSH-101 way more bearable to current CPUs.

Best regards,
Sebastian

Re: FEATURE REQUEST HERE

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:02 pm
by usrfobiwan
I really like the demo version except one thing.
Why on earth is 1/3 of the real estate used for a keyboard?
Drop the keyboard and up the scale of the rest.

I fixed it for you. All made larger, also rearranged the mixer to a more industry standard.
Synth layout

mixer layout