Drumazon v1.0.3
- Przemek@d16
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:10 pm
Drumazon v1.0.3
Please download Drumazon 1.0.3 update at Your Download Center account.
Changes
- GUI design
For the moment we have decided to slightly change the look of the Drumazon, while preserving the familiar user interface. For the near future, we are working on adding the option of using custom user skins for the Drumazon.
Cheers,
Przemek
Changes
- GUI design
For the moment we have decided to slightly change the look of the Drumazon, while preserving the familiar user interface. For the near future, we are working on adding the option of using custom user skins for the Drumazon.
Cheers,
Przemek
Last edited by Przemek@d16 on Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:58 am
OKAY... i'm a little pissed here:
1. how come it took Then so long to crack down on this? you guys were fine for over a year!
2. why didn't They have a problem with the Phoscyon interface
3. how come propellerheads didn't get into any trouble with ReBirth. this just doesn't sound fair to me?
4. you are selling VIRTUAL drum machines and synthesizers under different names that are INSPIRED by certain old drum machines and synthesizers, but they are no way the same. are there likenesses copyright? i mean, you are not purporting them to be 808s, 909s and 303s. what's the problem?
5. although it is probably not worth getting a lawyer and going through all that mental and financial hassle of fighting them on this, i do think D16 was well within their rights to make these fine virtual products.
6. instead of acting like children, if Roland thinks these intellectual properties are so valueable why the hell haven't they rereleased them themselves? the demand is obviously there. people would pay 3000 grand easily for an offical Roland TR-909 Limited Edition Replica...
yeesh. corporate politics. corporate bullshit.
but i'm rooting for the little guy! go D16 go!
all the best
graham miller | intrepid traveller
1. how come it took Then so long to crack down on this? you guys were fine for over a year!
2. why didn't They have a problem with the Phoscyon interface
3. how come propellerheads didn't get into any trouble with ReBirth. this just doesn't sound fair to me?
4. you are selling VIRTUAL drum machines and synthesizers under different names that are INSPIRED by certain old drum machines and synthesizers, but they are no way the same. are there likenesses copyright? i mean, you are not purporting them to be 808s, 909s and 303s. what's the problem?
5. although it is probably not worth getting a lawyer and going through all that mental and financial hassle of fighting them on this, i do think D16 was well within their rights to make these fine virtual products.
6. instead of acting like children, if Roland thinks these intellectual properties are so valueable why the hell haven't they rereleased them themselves? the demand is obviously there. people would pay 3000 grand easily for an offical Roland TR-909 Limited Edition Replica...
yeesh. corporate politics. corporate bullshit.
but i'm rooting for the little guy! go D16 go!
all the best
graham miller | intrepid traveller
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:58 am
If there is one synthmanufacturer that behaves like a dinosaur it is this company. They completely missed the software market.
This problem happened before with other software instruments emulating synths from .....
So I am not surprised at all. .
Because of this behaviour I willl never, ever buy any product from this company. Long live the small software companies! No matter what their GUI will look like!
This problem happened before with other software instruments emulating synths from .....
So I am not surprised at all. .
Because of this behaviour I willl never, ever buy any product from this company. Long live the small software companies! No matter what their GUI will look like!
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:50 am
- Location: Dublin
- Przemek@d16
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:10 pm
- Przemek@d16
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:10 pm
and if you want also to help us a little you can post also here http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=171726 
Cheers,
Przemek

Cheers,
Przemek
I don't understand Roland. I'd rather keep using 1.0.25 than this new skin, i don't mind really.
.. However I guess one has to upgrade to the skinnable version if there's a new technical improvement but I hope I can continue using the original skin, sorry I'm not having a tuner's mind
So, I think ths is a little bit double. As long as the plugin doesn't look like a 909 it's okey ? What about the sound: does that have to change as well ?
.. However I guess one has to upgrade to the skinnable version if there's a new technical improvement but I hope I can continue using the original skin, sorry I'm not having a tuner's mind

So, I think ths is a little bit double. As long as the plugin doesn't look like a 909 it's okey ? What about the sound: does that have to change as well ?

http://www.cosmicdreamer.be
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:50 am
- Location: Dublin
donePrzemek@d16 wrote:and if you want also to help us a little you can post also here http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=171726
Cheers,
Przemek
www.myspace.com/rhythmtechnologies
www.myspace.com/damagedtrax
www.myspace.com/damagedtrax
- Przemek@d16
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:10 pm
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:52 pm
i guess some jelous moron from some other company contacted Roland... maybe proppellorheadz.... who knows
I would point them to rebirth with the message. Sencor them first.... Or proph. had a contract with Roland for using the 808skin.
But nontheless. its a shame for the briliant rendering

I would point them to rebirth with the message. Sencor them first.... Or proph. had a contract with Roland for using the 808skin.
But nontheless. its a shame for the briliant rendering

Mascletas: "The most accurate simulation of thunder, humans can simulate..."
- Przemek@d16
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:10 pm